-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 23
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
exFAT support #65
Comments
Thank you for this request, @vlang-intona. You are correct to state this is not a copyright issue. But patents are serious issues too. The Eclipse Foundation will not accept contributions that willfully infringe on a patent. This would create significant legal liability for us. Anyone with a proper license to the relevant patent(s) can implement exFAT. However, getting such a license to cover FileX would be expensive, and we lack financial resources. Naturally, we can explore licensing the relevant patents if enough ThreadX and FileX users are willing to fund the initiative. |
That's interesting. I didn't know all the FAT patents (except exFAT) have run out, which is implied by your statement. Note that under azure-rtos, Microsoft did offer a free exFAT license on certain platforms: https://github.com/azure-rtos/filex/?tab=readme-ov-file#exfat-licensing This seems unavailable now with the move to Eclipse, all while azure-rtos/filex was set to read-only. |
@vlang-intona Yes, older versions of FAT are patent-free. They can be freely implemented. Whatever license Microsoft offered for Azure RTOS does not apply to Eclipse ThreadX. Do not forget Azure RTOS involved a commercial license unless you were using hardware from Microsoft's major silicon partners, which came bundled with such license. So, unless you have a valid Azure RTOS license, you cannot use exFAT. Microsoft discontinued the sales of such licenses. |
@fdesbiens We are covered by such a hardware license (the chip is listed in the previous FileX license). Looks like we have to stay with the old azure-rtos snapshot for now. Thank you for the clarifications. |
Would be cool. exFAT is patented, but it's not a copyright issue - anyone can implement exFAT and publish such an implementation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: