Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Considering using MapDB in place of HashFile. #2153

Closed
hmottestad opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Closed

Considering using MapDB in place of HashFile. #2153

hmottestad opened this issue Apr 30, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
⏩ performance stale issue has gone stale (close reason)

Comments

@hmottestad
Copy link
Contributor

We already use MapDB in RDF4J and upgrading to the latest version #2063

MapDB has on disk hash map support, which is very probably faster than our implementation in HashFile.

First step would be to implement the HashFile interface with MapDB and run our benchmarks to see how the performance is.
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 📋 Backlog in RDF4J Planning Jan 3, 2023
@abrokenjester abrokenjester added the stale issue has gone stale (close reason) label May 11, 2023
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📋 Backlog to ✅ Done in RDF4J Planning May 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
⏩ performance stale issue has gone stale (close reason)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@abrokenjester @hmottestad