You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In roof duality, we convert a bqm to a posiform , convert its coefficients to integer coefficients, then convert it to an implication graph and find the max flow. We use the max flow to compute the lower bound of the bqm, but we may be able to take the original posiform use the fixed variables and find the lower bound. This will bypass the float-to-integer and integer-to-float conversions and provide a more accurate lower bound. We need to find out a way how to use the original posiform since roof duality will not fix all the variables in the posiform.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
amahmudwave
changed the title
Calculate more numerically accurate lowr bound.
Calculate more numerically accurate lower bound.
Jun 7, 2021
In roof duality, we convert a bqm to a posiform , convert its coefficients to integer coefficients, then convert it to an implication graph and find the max flow. We use the max flow to compute the lower bound of the bqm, but we may be able to take the original posiform use the fixed variables and find the lower bound. This will bypass the float-to-integer and integer-to-float conversions and provide a more accurate lower bound. We need to find out a way how to use the original posiform since roof duality will not fix all the variables in the posiform.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: