You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When discussing this package with health systems, I have heard feedback that given the upcoming OCR 1157 changes, the pass / fail language is too strong and makes them feel like they need to report to regulators when they see fails with their models. This coupled with the fact that models may have the specific attributes they want to segment by as input features means that fails are missing the correct context.
It would be great if this language could be configured on a per attribute basis so users have the right context when reviewing the results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When discussing this package with health systems, I have heard feedback that given the upcoming OCR 1157 changes, the pass / fail language is too strong and makes them feel like they need to report to regulators when they see fails with their models. This coupled with the fact that models may have the specific attributes they want to segment by as input features means that fails are missing the correct context.
It would be great if this language could be configured on a per attribute basis so users have the right context when reviewing the results.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: