Link to other lakAras

[gasyoun]

Prakriyaa
Found 1 prakriyas
Please click on a prakriya below to expand/collapse

brūñ vyaktāyāṃ vāci (adādi ) - laṅ prathama. eka.

laṅ prathama. eka. is not very user friendly.

What if I press on laṅ and have a choise to see the same dhatu in:

laṭ, liṭ, luṭ, lṛṭ, leṭ, loṭ, laṅ, luṅ, lṛṅ

If in brūñ the ñ is an abbreviation, than why not capitalised?

Why is there a space in (adādi )?

Also I would want to know if it's a regular verb form or an exclusion.

[avinashvarna]

Why is there a space in (adādi )?

I will remove the space. This was caused because there was no it_status result for the particular form.

As to the other request, I think what you are asking for is a way to get all the forms for a given dhAtu+lakAra. As far as I understand, the API does not expose that information currently, but I will let @drdhaval2785 comment.

[drdhaval2785]

Currently the API and data is arranged to search from verb form to the details like lakaara etc. It is quite possible to have details to verb form, but data will have to be rearranged and separate API will be needed. Currently not supported.

[avinashvarna]

Why is there a space in (adādi )?

Space removed in 02188e9

[gasyoun]

This was caused because there was no it_status result for the particular form.

Because Panini does not state it or why?

[drdhaval2785]

no it_status

Because the form you entered did not have an iDAgama. Whether the iDAgama will happen or not depends on the root and the suffix. When both conditions are satisfied, then only the iDAgama will happen.
Therefore, for non -iDAgama forms, the item will remain blank.

[drdhaval2785]

Now the UI has a facility to pass parameters too.
So it should be possible to give the links to other forms on the page in Adidtional information.

[drdhaval2785]

@avinashvarna Now we can get the details of verb forms for given verb, lakAra, purusha and vachana via API at https://api.sanskritworld.in/#!/default/get_gen_data.
So the possible way to implement this feature is

1. Get the all 10 * 3 * 3 = 90 combinations of lakara * purusha * vachana for given verb.
   e.g. https://api.sanskritworld.in/v0.0.2/generate/slp1/eDa~/low/praTama/bahu?output_transliteration=devanagari will give us ["एधन्ताम्"]. Similarly rest 89 combinations can be generated.

2. Link those forms like एधन्ताम्.

[avinashvarna]

I think issuing 90 HTTP requests to retrieve 1 form at a time can be quite slow and involves a lot of overhead. Can the API do:

• Given just dhAtu (i.e. if lakAra, puruSha, vachana is not specified), return all ~90 forms.
• Given just dhAtu, lakAra, return the ~9 forms for that lakAra
  etc.
  The UI can be much more efficient in its requests then.

[drdhaval2785]

Ohh. I guess that should be quick to implement. And yes, 90 requests is way too inefficient. Agree

[drdhaval2785]

@avinashvarna Would the following format of data be OK for you?
I know your preference about method than getitem. But currently I am concerned about output.
If it is OK for you, I will work on input method development.

>>> g['BU', 'law']
{u'10.0277': {u'mas': [u'BAvayAmaH'], u'sip': [u'BAvayasi'], u'Dvam': [u'BAvayaDve'], u'AtAm': [u'BAvayete'], u'ATAm': [u'BAvayeTe'], u'Tas': [u'BAvayaTaH'], u'tas': [u'BAvayataH'], u'tip': [u'BAvayati'], u'vahi': [u'BAvayAvahe'], u'Ji': [u'BAvayanti'], u'iw': [u'BAvaye'], u'vas': [u'BAvayAvaH'], u'TAs': [u'BAvayase'], u'mip': [u'BAvayAmi'], u'ta': [u'BAvayate'], u'Ja': [u'BAvayante'], u'mahiN': [u'BAvayAmahe'], u'Ta': [u'BAvayaTa']}, u'10.0382': {u'mas': [u'BAvayAmaH'], u'sip': [u'BAvayasi'], u'Dvam': [u'BAvayaDve'], u'AtAm': [u'BAvayete'], u'ATAm': [u'BAvayeTe'], u'Tas': [u'BAvayaTaH'], u'tas': [u'BAvayataH'], u'tip': [u'BAvayati'], u'vahi': [u'BAvayAvahe'], u'Ji': [u'BAvayanti'], u'iw': [u'BAvaye'], u'vas': [u'BAvayAvaH'], u'TAs': [u'BAvayase'], u'mip': [u'BAvayAmi'], u'ta': [u'BAvayate'], u'Ja': [u'BAvayante'], u'mahiN': [u'BAvayAmahe'], u'Ta': [u'BAvayaTa']}, u'01.0001': {u'mas': [u'BavAmaH'], u'sip': [u'Bavasi'], u'Tas': [u'BavaTaH'], u'tas': [u'BavataH'], u'tip': [u'Bavati'], u'Ji': [u'Bavanti'], u'vas': [u'BavAvaH'], u'mip': [u'BavAmi'], u'Ta': [u'BavaTa']}}

[vvasuki]

आदौ ममास्त्यत्र सम्भ्रमः! णिजन्तरूपाण्यपि दृश्यन्त इति।

अस्तु - तथापि प्रष्टव्यम् - '10.0277' इति किम्? अस्पष्टम्। णिजन्तञ्चेत् "भू", "णिच्" इति स्वीकुर्यात्।

[drdhaval2785]

अधुना णिजन्तरूपाणि न प्रदर्श्यन्ते । तथा कर्तुं शक्यते किञ्चित्कालानन्तरम्‌ । १०.०२७७ इति तु धातुक्रमाङ्कः धातुपाठे ।

भू॑ - अवकल्कने मिश्रीकरण इत्येके चिन्तन इत्यन्ये, चुरादि 10.0382
भू॑ - प्राप्तौ, चुरादि 10.0277
भू॑ - सत्तायाम्, भ्वादि 01.0001

धातुधात्वर्थगणाश्च दर्शनीयाः इति भाति ।
तेन कस्य धातोः रूपाणीति स्पष्टीभविष्यति ।

[vvasuki]

आह् - अवैम्यधुना - "भावयामि रघुरामम्"! साधु बोधितोऽस्मि।

[avinashvarna]

युज्यते । एवं च प्रार्थये -

• प्रक्रियायां यथा धातुक्रमाङ्कः दर्श्यते, तथैव अत्रापि भवेत् (तन्नाम् प्रक्रियायां देवनागर्यादिषु दर्श्यते चेत् अत्रापि तथैव स्यात्) । नो चेत् UI मध्ये transliteration करणीयं भवेत् ।
• पुनश्च यदि तिबादयः प्रत्यया अपि न परिवर्त्यन्ते तर्हि सौकर्यं स्यात् । तन्नामि रूपाणि देवनागर्यादिषु प्रदर्श्यन्ते चेदपि {'tip':[भावयति], 'tas':[भावयतः], ...} इत्येव भवेत् । (json schema इत्यस्य परिवर्तनं न भवेत् इति )

[gasyoun]

But currently I am concerned about output.

Exactly.