You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
$ time bin/regexploit
Welcome to Regexploit. Enter your regexes:
(?i:(?:j|&#x?0*(?:74|4A|106|6A);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:a|&#x?0*(?:65|41|97|61);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:v|&#x?0*(?:86|56|118|76);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:a|&#x?0*(?:65|41|97|61);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:s|&#x?0*(?:83|53|115|73);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:c|&#x?0*(?:67|43|99|63);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:r|&#x?0*(?:82|52|114|72);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:i|&#x?0*(?:73|49|105|69);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:p|&#x?0*(?:80|50|112|70);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?:t|&#x?0*(?:84|54|116|74);?)(?:\t|&(?:#x?0*(?:9|13|10|A|D);?|tab;|newline;))*(?::|&(?:#x?0*(?:58|3A);?|colon;)).)(regexp)
^C
real 3m34,572s
user 3m33,582s
sys 0m0,016s
as you can see, in this case I terminated the process after 3 min and 34 secs.
so this one took 16 seconds, which is much more than the others - I run about 300 different checks, except these two expressions all of them run within few (ten/hundred) milliseconds.
The second one wouldn't be problem, but it's a bit weird. The first one is problematic, and would be fine to find the reason of that behavior - I would like to integrate this into a CI/CD environment.
Could you help me to investigate these?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have two expressions which run too long time:
as you can see, in this case I terminated the process after 3 min and 34 secs.
so this one took 16 seconds, which is much more than the others - I run about 300 different checks, except these two expressions all of them run within few (ten/hundred) milliseconds.
The second one wouldn't be problem, but it's a bit weird. The first one is problematic, and would be fine to find the reason of that behavior - I would like to integrate this into a CI/CD environment.
Could you help me to investigate these?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: