-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is the annotation rule same as the FUNSD? #1
Comments
Thank you for sharing the dataset @ranpox @wolfshow. I agree with @tengerye. I'm trying to annotate my custom dataset to train with XFUND. I made visualizations on the existing datasets (XFUND and FUNDS) to properly understand annotation rules. Orange, blue, green, and pink boxes correspond to the header, question, answer, and other respectively. a) Question or Header?FUNSDXFUNDHeaders do not contain linking arrays in XFUND whereas FUNSD contains a lot of header with linking array that points b) Unanswered QuestionsFUNSDXFUNDXFUND docs labeled such as unanswered questions tagged as Other (see 'Téléphone 2') c) Labeling InconsistenciesXFUND - 1XFUND - 2IDENTITE is tagged as question but Identité du candidat is tagged as other in different images from XFUND. |
@Isydmr We are working on XFUND v1.1. Please stay tuned. |
What is the timeline for XFUND v1.1? |
+1 |
Any idea on the timeline for XFUND v1.1? I'm considering annotating a Dutch dataset in XFUND style. |
Hi, may I ask if the annotation rule is the same as FUNSD? There are a number of strange examples.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: