Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 15, 2019. It is now read-only.

Why solver._step() shouldn't be called manually? #147

Open
VoVAllen opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 0 comments
Open

Why solver._step() shouldn't be called manually? #147

VoVAllen opened this issue Feb 6, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@VoVAllen
Copy link

VoVAllen commented Feb 6, 2017

I think solver._step() is quite a useful and necessary API to be open to the users.

Manually iterate batches and step can help debug and watch the internal variable changes. Also some training tricks in GAN need this. (Such as update discriminator once when the generator is updated ten times). I think only solver.train() lacks the flexibility.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant