Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reverts entity data without locking for better performance #1452

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shubham1g5
Copy link
Contributor

@shubham1g5 shubham1g5 commented Nov 29, 2024

Technical Summary

Return entity data if available without extra overhead caused by aquiring a db lock. This cuts the loading time of a 10k case list by half when already cached.

Safety Assurance

Safety story

I can't imagine us needing a lock just to return a set variable which is all this PR does.

Automated test coverage

NA

QA Plan

None

Special deploy instructions

  • This PR can be deployed after merge with no further considerations.

Rollback instructions

  • This PR can be reverted after deploy with no further considerations.

Review

  • The set of people pinged as reviewers is appropriate for the level of risk of the change.

Duplicate PR

Automatically duplicate this PR as defined in contributing.md.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced retrieval process for sorting data, improving efficiency.
    • Improved thread safety in data handling with synchronized blocks.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Refined error handling for sort field evaluations, providing clearer logging.

@shubham1g5
Copy link
Contributor Author

@coderabbitai full review please

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

@shubham1g5: I will perform a full review of the PR.

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Walkthrough

The AsyncEntity class has been modified to enhance the efficiency and safety of its methods. Key changes include an updated getSortField method that now checks for cached sort data and employs a try-with-resources statement for improved locking and error handling. The getAltTextData method has been adjusted to include a synchronized block, ensuring thread safety when accessing shared resources. These modifications collectively aim to optimize data retrieval and enhance the reliability of concurrent operations.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/main/java/org/commcare/cases/entity/AsyncEntity.java - Updated getSortField(int i): Added conditional check for cached sort data and improved error handling with try-with-resources.
- Updated getAltTextData(int i): Added synchronized block for thread safety in variable context loading.

Poem

In the code where bunnies play,
AsyncEntity hops all day.
With cached data, swift and bright,
It sorts and fetches, pure delight!
Thread safety's now a cozy nest,
In our code, we surely rest! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/main/java/org/commcare/cases/entity/AsyncEntity.java (1)

138-138: Document the locking strategy

The class uses a complex locking strategy with both database-level locks and object-level synchronization. While there's a comment about lock ordering, it would be valuable to add comprehensive documentation about:

  1. The exact order of lock acquisition
  2. Why this order prevents deadlocks
  3. Which operations require which locks

Add a class-level documentation block like:

/**
 * Threading Model:
 * This class uses two levels of locking:
 * 1. Database-level locking (via EntityStorageCache)
 * 2. Object-level locking (via mAsyncLock)
 *
 * Lock Ordering:
 * To prevent deadlocks, locks must be acquired in the following order:
 * 1. First acquire the database lock (via lockCache())
 * 2. Then acquire the object lock (via synchronized(mAsyncLock))
 *
 * Operations requiring both locks:
 * - Writing to the cache
 * - Reading from the cache when value isn't in memory
 *
 * Operations requiring only object lock:
 * - Reading/writing in-memory values
 */
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 25a9317 and eea08fa.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/main/java/org/commcare/cases/entity/AsyncEntity.java (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/main/java/org/commcare/cases/entity/AsyncEntity.java (1)

Line range hint 138-179: Verify performance impact of lock changes

While the changes aim to improve performance by avoiding unnecessary locks, we should verify the actual impact on loading times, especially for the mentioned case of 10,000 entries.

Run the following script to analyze lock-related patterns in the codebase:

Comment on lines +135 to +137
if (sortData[i] != null) {
return sortData[i];
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix thread safety issue in early return check

The early return check of sortData[i] is not thread-safe. Without proper synchronization, changes to sortData[i] made by other threads may not be visible due to the Java Memory Model's visibility guarantees.

Apply this diff to fix the thread visibility issue:

-        if (sortData[i] != null) {
-            return sortData[i];
-        }
+        synchronized (mAsyncLock) {
+            if (sortData[i] != null) {
+                return sortData[i];
+            }
+        }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
if (sortData[i] != null) {
return sortData[i];
}
synchronized (mAsyncLock) {
if (sortData[i] != null) {
return sortData[i];
}
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant