Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 21, 2022. It is now read-only.

Explicit behavior for key #52

Closed
liuggio opened this issue Jan 22, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Explicit behavior for key #52

liuggio opened this issue Jan 22, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@liuggio
Copy link

liuggio commented Jan 22, 2015

Would be great if the key has an interface with a Byte() func instead of interface{} type

What do you think? Implicit is better than explicit :), btw this would introduce a huge BC...

cfr: gin-gonic/contrib#19

@dgrijalva
Copy link
Owner

See #50

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants