You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
thanks for this nice package. As I am not fluent in C/C++, I wrote a light Julia wrapper and I am now testing this, especially the use of tensor contraction (tblis_tensor_mult).
However, my tests only seem to result in the correct answer if I don't try to complex conjugate A or B. Is this not implemented yet, or am I incorrectly specifying the conjugation flag. Why is this an int and not a bool?
Thanks,
Jutho
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, unfortunately complex conjugation does not work at the moment. I should get time to fix this in a month or so.
As for the conjugation flag, it is an int because that is easier than supporting both C99 bool and C++ bool simultaneously. It uses the usual 0 = false, not 0 = true.
thank you for this useful library.
Has there been any news on this issue? As far as I can see, conjugation still does not work in tblis_tensor_mult and so I have been explicitly conjugating (and back-conjugating) before (and after) using the routine.
But after a quick look at the code, I can see that conj is used at some points in the code, e.g. in src/internal/3t/dense/mult.cxx at line 869
but I wasn't able to get a clear enough picture on which overloaded mult function is called where and why and when conjugating would work and where not so far.
Edit: After having another look, I see the "TODO"s in internal/3t/dpd/mult.cxx before
Hi Devin,
thanks for this nice package. As I am not fluent in C/C++, I wrote a light Julia wrapper and I am now testing this, especially the use of tensor contraction (
tblis_tensor_mult
).However, my tests only seem to result in the correct answer if I don't try to complex conjugate A or B. Is this not implemented yet, or am I incorrectly specifying the conjugation flag. Why is this an
int
and not abool
?Thanks,
Jutho
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: