Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve Security by Replacing MD5 Hash Function in generate_key Method #121

Open
kiransbsf opened this issue Aug 2, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@kiransbsf
Copy link

kiransbsf commented Aug 2, 2024

The current implementation of the generate_key method in the wp-background-process.php, class uses the `md5' hash function to generate unique keys for batch processing. Snyk.io has reported a vulnerability associated with this usage, citing that 'md5' is insecure and susceptible to collision attacks.

Issue Details:

File: wp-background-process.php

Current Implementation:

protected function generate_key( $length = 64, $key = 'batch' ) {
    $unique  = md5( microtime() . wp_rand() );
    $prepend = $this->identifier . '_' . $key . '_';

    return substr( $prepend . $unique, 0, $length );
}

Vulnerability: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort

Suggested Improvement:
To enhance the security of the codebase, it is recommended to replace the 'md5' hash function with a more secure alternative, such as SHA-256, which provides better resistance against collision attacks. The updated implementation:

protected function generate_key( $length = 64, $key = 'batch' ) {
    $unique  = hash( 'sha256', microtime() . wp_rand() );
    $prepend = $this->identifier . '_' . $key . '_';

    return substr( $prepend . $unique, 0, $length );
}

By making this change, we can ensure that the unique keys generated are more secure and less susceptible to attacks.

@koen12344
Copy link

The md5 string just serves as a unique identifier here, its not a security token

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants