Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backward diffusion at inlet #519

Open
SnKzm opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Backward diffusion at inlet #519

SnKzm opened this issue Oct 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@SnKzm
Copy link

SnKzm commented Oct 11, 2024

Hello,

In order to accurately simulate laminar cases where diffusion plays a significant role, the solver should account for backward diffusion of species at the inlet, which has a major impact on the inlet mass fractions. Other CFD solvers capable of simulating laminar reacting flows provide an option to consider diffusion at the inlet.

It would be beneficial to implement a new boundary condition that includes diffusion flux. This addition would complement DeepFlame's existing capability to accurately calculate diffusion coefficients.

Please refer to the BC used in this paper:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010218016000699

Or, LaminarSmoke repository that has this BC:
https://github.com/acuoci/laminarSMOKE/tree/master/libs/boundaryConditionsOpenSMOKE%2B%2B/backwardDiffusion

Or, the definition of the inlet B.C. of Cantera one-D flames:
https://cantera.org/science/flames.html

Or, Fluent solver:
https://www.afs.enea.it/project/neptunius/docs/fluent/html/ug/node578.htm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant