Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Are you planning to continue maintaining it on 1.x? #132

Open
OnkelTem opened this issue Oct 30, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Are you planning to continue maintaining it on 1.x? #132

OnkelTem opened this issue Oct 30, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@OnkelTem
Copy link

OnkelTem commented Oct 30, 2022

Currently, the functionality of core sliding panes is broken and analyzing forum activity on this matter, it doesn't look like there is a big demand to get the new "tab stack" fixed (or it's just considered as "working properly"). And if I understand it right, we cannot continue using the Sliding Panes plugin on v.1: it's being disabled automatically.

It would be really cool to have this plugin working as before, but on 1.x.

Meanwhile, I just rolled back to 0.15.

@OnkelTem
Copy link
Author

OnkelTem commented Oct 30, 2022

Answering on what is broken right now in the sliding tab stack on 1.x:

  1. The behaviour of tabs is wrong, they don't always open when clicking on them.
  2. It doesn't allow adjusting widths in the UI
  3. It doesn't have the min-width setting so your content is constantly re-layouting
  4. The sliding animation is laggy as hell

@nhan000
Copy link

nhan000 commented Dec 15, 2022

I use the https://github.com/pjeby/pane-relief#simple-sliding-panes-mode of Pane Relief Plugin. That, together with the tab function of Obsidian is even better than the old Sliding Panes features for me.

@sunsoy
Copy link

sunsoy commented Jan 30, 2023

I've also been caught by the lack of pane width adjustment in 1.x :( minor grievance

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants