You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 18, 2024. It is now read-only.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It seems strange when you have all this unused grey space suitable for ~4:3 ratio portraits for the combatant cards on the CC, especially when you haven't got a huge monitor.
Describe the solution you'd like
An option to make the height of these cards suitable for 1:1 ratio portraits.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The only alternative here is to use ~4:3 ratio portraits, which are rarely used. It's much easier to make/find square/circle portrait, and they are 1:1 ratio. Also, 1:1 ratio is a standard ratio for character lists.
Additional context
How it is now:
Quick reference to what I'm talking (not very accurate):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Really wish this was an option. It would make this module play much better with anyone using Tokenizer to help make their in-game tokens. Tokenizer creates 1:1 ratio images that would fit much better in this suggested format. It would allow for edge-to-edge avatar images in the carousel frames rather than having so much empty space at top and bottom.
Came here to request this same thing. I'd add that it would be nice if it collapsed even more if you have the health bar turned off. Basically, it should take up as little room as possible based on its configuration.
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
It seems strange when you have all this unused grey space suitable for ~4:3 ratio portraits for the combatant cards on the CC, especially when you haven't got a huge monitor.
Describe the solution you'd like
An option to make the height of these cards suitable for 1:1 ratio portraits.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The only alternative here is to use ~4:3 ratio portraits, which are rarely used. It's much easier to make/find square/circle portrait, and they are 1:1 ratio. Also, 1:1 ratio is a standard ratio for character lists.
Additional context
How it is now:
Quick reference to what I'm talking (not very accurate):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: