Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Different efficiency for AC and DC charging/discharging #345

Open
anton4 opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@anton4
Copy link

anton4 commented Sep 18, 2024

Describe the improvement - #1

It would be nice if we could configure different efficiency multiplier/factor when charging battery from AC and DC (solar)
Charging from AC is less efficient than charging from solar (DC) meaning a lot more energy is being wasted as heat.

This feature would make the model calculation even more accurate.

Describe the improvement - #1.5

It would be nice if we could set different efficiency factors depending on the battery charging/discharging power.
This depends on the length and diameter of your wires (both AC and DC)
For example when charging at 2kW, the loss of power is 100W, but when charging at 20kW, the loss of power is 2kW.

Describe the improvement - #2

The lower your battery charging power is the less power is wasted as heat (wires, inverter internals, etc.).
For example - import price of cheapest electricity is the same for 4 hours straight, there is no solar (winter) and battery charging (0-100%) takes 2 hours if done at max charge rate.
At the moment emhass model wants to charge the battery with 2 hours, but it would be more efficient if it would spread the charge time to max available hours (4 in this case).

This feature would make emhass more efficient and not waste electricity to heat by not charging at max power when it's not needed.

@davidusb-geek
Copy link
Owner

Yes a lot of room for improvement.
Ideally we should also use variable efficiencies as a function of the actual power.
However this will often mean more complex MILP formulations.
But a different constant efficiency for AC and DC sides seems like a reasonable easy thing to do

@davidusb-geek davidusb-geek added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Sep 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants