Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

.NET Core 2.0 plans? #19

Open
buddyfavors opened this issue Sep 12, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

.NET Core 2.0 plans? #19

buddyfavors opened this issue Sep 12, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

@buddyfavors
Copy link

I took a quick stab at trying to upgrade it but I got stuck at an error in LazyLoadingEntityMaterializerSource. The first time was instantiated currentDbContext was null, but after that it was fine.

According to the EF roadmap they do have a stretch goal of lazy loading in their 2.1 release timed with the release of .NET Core 2.1.

@darxis
Copy link
Owner

darxis commented Sep 12, 2017

The current release supports EF Core v1.1.1, and probably also v1.1.2.

It would be nice to support EF Core v2.0, I will surely take a look into this as soon as I have some free time, which I lack recently.

PS: I doubt they will release Lazy Loading support in EF Core 2.1, based on the comments in this issue: dotnet/efcore#3797. Better implement v2.0 support in this repo, hopefully there will not be much more work to make it compatible v2.1. Don't rely on them to implement official LazyLoading support :)

@buddyfavors
Copy link
Author

I haven't had any issues using this against EF Core v1.1.2, but yeah it would be awesome if this supported v2.0, I had to actually downgrade to .NET Core 1.1 as the existing project relies on Lazy Loading.

@CJTalbot87
Copy link

Support for 2.0 would be great, also does LazyLoading work for nested hierarchical Entities?

Let me know if I can help with any testing!

@nicollaas94
Copy link

Any news on this ?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants