You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When this module was broken out for D3 3.x, we switched from position to velocity Verlet. I believe the idea was to avoid certain ordering effects and instabilities as a result of forces incrementally modifying node positions as they ran. However, the new force layout feels… more sluggish than the old one. Here’s an example:
When this module was broken out for D3 3.x, we switched from position to velocity Verlet. I believe the idea was to avoid certain ordering effects and instabilities as a result of forces incrementally modifying node positions as they ran. However, the new force layout feels… more sluggish than the old one. Here’s an example:
https://bl.ocks.org/mbostock/7881887
https://observablehq.com/@d3/clustered-bubbles-2
Going back to the D3 3.x method of integration would be disruptive (for custom forces), but it’s worth considering.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: