You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
First of all, thanks and congrats to the researchers and developers for this amazing set of contributions. They are really handy and will impact the community quite positively!!
I was looking through the code to have a better understanding and I hit a place that may have a typo. Here both neg0 and neg1 are assigned to the weight matrix using the same dimension (m), which may hold true when the number of elements is the same in both images, but out of that case it may not work.
Shouldn't it be weights[:, -1, :n] = neg1 ?
Best,
Alberto
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
First of all, thanks and congrats to the researchers and developers for this amazing set of contributions. They are really handy and will impact the community quite positively!!
I was looking through the code to have a better understanding and I hit a place that may have a typo.
Here both neg0 and neg1 are assigned to the weight matrix using the same dimension (m), which may hold true when the number of elements is the same in both images, but out of that case it may not work.
Shouldn't it be
weights[:, -1, :n] = neg1
?Best,
Alberto
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: