👍🎉 First off, thanks for taking the time to contribute! 🎉👍
The following is a set of guidelines for contributing on GitHub. These are mostly guidelines, not rules. Use your best judgment, and feel free to propose changes to this document in a pull request.
- Git Commit Messages
- JavaScript Styleguide
- CoffeeScript Styleguide
- Specs Styleguide
- Documentation Styleguide
This project and everyone participating in it is governed by the Repo Code of Conduct.
This section guides you through submitting a bug report for this Repo. Following these guidelines helps maintainers and the community understand your report 📝, reproduce the behavior 💻 💻, and find related reports 🔎.
Before creating bug reports, please check this list as you might find out that you don't need to create one. When you are creating a bug report, please include as many details as possible.
Note: If you find a Closed issue that seems like it is the same thing that you're experiencing, open a new issue and include a link to the original issue in the body of your new one.
Bugs are tracked as GitHub issues. After you've determined your bug is related to, create an issue on that repository and provide the following information by filling in template
Provide more context by answering these questions:
Unsure where to begin contributing? You can start by looking through these beginner and help-wanted issues:
- [Beginner issues][beginner] - issues which should only require a few lines of code, and a test or two.
- [Help wanted issues][help-wanted] - issues which should be a bit more involved than
beginnerissues.
Both issue lists are sorted by total number of comments. While not perfect, number of comments is a reasonable proxy for impact a given change will have.
The process described here has several goals:
- Fix problems that are important to users
- Engage the community in working toward the best possible
- Enable a sustainable system for maintainers to review contributions
Please follow these steps to have your contribution considered by the maintainers:
- Follow all instructions in the template
- Follow the styleguides
- After you submit your pull request, verify that all status checks are passing
What if the status checks are failing?
If a status check is failing, and you believe that the failure is unrelated to your change, please leave a comment on the pull request explaining why you believe the failure is unrelated. A maintainer will re-run the status check for you. If we conclude that the failure was a false positive, then we will open an issue to track that problem with our status check suite.
While the prerequisites above must be satisfied prior to having your pull request reviewed, the reviewer(s) may ask you to complete additional design work, tests, or other changes before your pull request can be ultimately accepted.
- Use the present tense ("Add feature" not "Added feature")
- Use the imperative mood ("Move cursor to..." not "Moves cursor to...")
- Limit the first line to 72 characters or less
- Reference issues and pull requests liberally after the first line
- When only changing documentation, include
[ci skip]in the commit title - Consider starting the commit message with an applicable emoji:
- 🎨
:art:when improving the format/structure of the code - 🐎
:racehorse:when improving performance - 🚱
:non-potable_water:when plugging memory leaks - 📝
:memo:when writing docs - 🐧
:penguin:when fixing something on Linux - 🍎
:apple:when fixing something on macOS - 🏁
:checkered_flag:when fixing something on Windows - 🐛
:bug:when fixing a bug - 🔥
:fire:when removing code or files - 💚
:green_heart:when fixing the CI build - ✅
:white_check_mark:when adding tests - 🔒
:lock:when dealing with security - ⬆️
:arrow_up:when upgrading dependencies - ⬇️
:arrow_down:when downgrading dependencies - 👕
:shirt:when removing linter warnings
- 🎨