Problem: no upgrade plan for testnet #1322
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent update involves introducing a new upgrade plan named Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Signed-off-by: mmsqe <[email protected]>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1322 +/- ##
===========================================
+ Coverage 15.85% 36.38% +20.52%
===========================================
Files 80 118 +38
Lines 6249 10755 +4506
===========================================
+ Hits 991 3913 +2922
- Misses 5178 6463 +1285
- Partials 80 379 +299
|
mmsqe
requested review from
yihuang and
JayT106
and removed request for
a team
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (4)
- CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
- app/upgrades.go (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/upgrade-testnet-test-package.nix (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_upgrade.py (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
integration_tests/configs/upgrade-testnet-test-package.nix (1)
- 16-16: The update to the package path for the testnet upgrade plan is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.
app/upgrades.go (2)
- 122-122: The update to the
testnetPlanNamevariable is correctly implemented and aligns with the PR's objectives.- 122-122: The removal of lines related to
CronosKeeperandFeeMarketKeeperin theSetUpgradeHandlerfunction simplifies the upgrade process. However, it's important to verify that this simplification does not introduce any unintended side effects or regressions in the upgrade process.integration_tests/test_upgrade.py (2)
- 142-142: The update to the
plan_namevariable in the integration test script correctly reflects the new testnet upgrade plan name and aligns with the PR's objectives.- 142-142: The removal of queries and assertions related to "max_callback_gas" in the integration test script is likely aimed at aligning with the updated upgrade plan. However, it's important to verify that this change does not omit necessary validations that ensure the upgrade process works as expected.
Verification successful
Given the need to verify the impact of removing queries and assertions related to "max_callback_gas" on the necessary validations in the integration tests, we will search the codebase for references to "max_callback_gas" and any related changes in the tests. This will help us understand whether the removal of these elements affects the integrity of the upgrade validation process.
The script output provides detailed information about the usage of "max_callback_gas" within the codebase and the specific changes made to the integration tests that involve this parameter. From the output, we can observe the following:
The parameter "max_callback_gas" is referenced in various parts of the codebase, including protobuf definitions, simulation settings, and swagger documentation. This indicates its importance in the system's configuration.
A specific pull request (#1252) added a plan
v1.1.0-testnetto update the defaultmax_callback_gasparameter, suggesting that adjustments to this parameter are part of the upgrade process.The integration test
test_gov_update_params.pyincludes a test case that updates themax_callback_gasparameter among others, indicating that there is a mechanism to test changes to this parameter through governance proposals.The commit
ec57b6cc9df892d233cd60f706c38163c6f183dbshows the removal of assertions related tomax_callback_gasintest_upgrade.py. This removal is part of a broader set of changes aimed at fixing the test, which suggests that the test was adjusted to align with the new upgrade plan.Given this context, the removal of queries and assertions related to "max_callback_gas" in the integration test script seems to be a deliberate decision to align with the updated upgrade plan. The presence of other tests that can update and verify the
max_callback_gasparameter, as well as the inclusion of this parameter in the upgrade plan, suggests that necessary validations related to this parameter can still be performed through other means.Therefore, based on the information gathered, it appears that the removal of specific queries and assertions related to "max_callback_gas" does not omit necessary validations in the integration tests, as other mechanisms are in place to ensure the upgrade process works as expected.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that the removal of queries and assertions related to "max_callback_gas" does not omit necessary validations in the integration tests. # This script is a placeholder for the actual verification steps, which should be performed manually or through automated tests. echo "Manual verification needed to ensure the removal of queries and assertions related to 'max_callback_gas' does not omit necessary validations."Length of output: 298
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for references to "max_callback_gas" in the codebase to understand its usage and the context of its removal. rg "max_callback_gas" --context 5 # Search for recent changes in the integration tests that might relate to the upgrade process and "max_callback_gas". git log -p -S "max_callback_gas" -- integration_tests/Length of output: 23491
CHANGELOG.md (1)
- 10-10: The addition of the new upgrade plan
v1.1.0-testnet-1for the testnet is well-documented under the "State Machine Breaking" section for the releasev1.1.0-rc4. The inclusion of the PR link enhances traceability and accountability. Good job on maintaining a clear and concise CHANGELOG.
Co-authored-by: yihuang <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: mmsqe <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- app/upgrades.go (2 hunks)
- integration_tests/configs/upgrade-testnet-test-package.nix (1 hunks)
- integration_tests/test_upgrade.py (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- app/upgrades.go
- integration_tests/configs/upgrade-testnet-test-package.nix
- integration_tests/test_upgrade.py
👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻 !!!! REFERENCE THE PROBLEM YOUR ARE SOLVING IN THE PR TITLE AND DESCRIBE YOUR SOLUTION HERE !!!! DO NOT FORGET !!!! 👮🏻👮🏻👮🏻
PR Checklist:
make)make test)go fmt)golangci-lint run)go list -json -m all | nancy sleuth)Thank you for your code, it's appreciated! :)
Summary by CodeRabbit
v1.1.0-testnet-1for the testnet, enhancing the platform's capabilities and performance.