Update crossplane-runtime to v1.17.0 and upjet to db86f70a1651 #695
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rickard-von-essen
requested review from
ulucinar,
sergenyalcin and
turkenf
as code owners
Add new arg to conversion.RegisterConversions() github.com/crossplane/crossplane-runtime v1.17.0 github.com/crossplane/upjet v1.4.1-0.20250108142216-db86f70a1651 Signed-off-by: Rickard von Essen <[email protected]>
rickard-von-essen
force-pushed
the
xp-runtime-v1.17.0
branch
from
95f6b59 to
086348b
Compare
|
/test-examples="examples/secretmanager/v1beta2/secret.yaml,examples/cloudplatform/v1beta1/serviceaccount.yaml" |
9 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add new arg to
conversion.RegisterConversions()Updated these deps:
Description of your changes
I have:
make reviewableto ensure this PR is ready for review.Addedbackport release-x.ylabels to auto-backport this PR if necessary.How has this code been tested
Sanity checked by running
e2ewith