You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some team has implemented EIP-712 signatures in CowProtocol using Fireblocks and managed to trade using the SDK.
Right now the SDK is not web3 library agnostic. This issue would be to allow to use Fireblocks library in the SDK.
They provided the snippet of conde on how they created the order. We already have the signing schema, so this issue would be just to abstract the instantiation of the SDK to accept fireblocks, so the SDK can sign orders using the library.
Some team has implemented EIP-712 signatures in CowProtocol using Fireblocks and managed to trade using the SDK.
Right now the SDK is not web3 library agnostic. This issue would be to allow to use Fireblocks library in the SDK.
They provided the snippet of conde on how they created the order. We already have the signing schema, so this issue would be just to abstract the instantiation of the SDK to accept fireblocks, so the SDK can sign orders using the library.
Snippet the team shared:
the fireblocks payload above requires a primaryType: “Order” field
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: