You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Insertion of slices results in uneven coverage of the voxels. The slices are added in, but just because certain slices are observed more does not mean that the values in those voxels should be increased. It just means that the certainty is going up. The expectation require "dividing out" after doing the sum.
One method to "average in" the slices inserts ones and the particle values in parallel, and then divide the "half map" by the "count map". This "dividing out" can be done in a a few ways to protect against numerical instability and noise blow up.
TODO:
implement various methods to be benchmarked
To a survey to see what other reconstruction software does
geoffwoollard
changed the title
implement and benchmark methods to normalize half maps
iterative ref: implement and benchmark methods to normalize half maps
Mar 30, 2022
Insertion of slices results in uneven coverage of the voxels. The slices are added in, but just because certain slices are observed more does not mean that the values in those voxels should be increased. It just means that the certainty is going up. The expectation require "dividing out" after doing the sum.
One method to "average in" the slices inserts ones and the particle values in parallel, and then divide the "half map" by the "count map". This "dividing out" can be done in a a few ways to protect against numerical instability and noise blow up.
TODO:
See
https://github.com/compSPI/reconstructSPI/pull/21/files/33e3229b1dd193f1cecdc7334668b3e991cdf4de..01ceaf5f7f80614fae628a89649908ca11d1a9a0#r836914864
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: