You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The way this bug comes about is actually pretty fascinating. But it leads to the most unhelpful possible error message.
If you try to take the SVD of a 0x0 matrix, it will notice that the matrix is at least 20% wider than tall (because 0 is 20% more than 0), and thus it will take the SVD of its transpose instead. And its transpose is also 20% wider than tall. Repeat.
This should just give a reasonable error message.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The way this bug comes about is actually pretty fascinating. But it leads to the most unhelpful possible error message.
If you try to take the SVD of a 0x0 matrix, it will notice that the matrix is at least 20% wider than tall (because 0 is 20% more than 0), and thus it will take the SVD of its transpose instead. And its transpose is also 20% wider than tall. Repeat.
This should just give a reasonable error message.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: