-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The structure of the repository #8
Comments
So, I added some files to get started with. |
Concerning containers, I propose following guidelines:
What do you think? |
@KerstenBreuer I think that is a great start about the containers |
I refactored repository, so all the tools are within the folder Also, I added some other tools. If the tool with the same name already exists, I add suffix I haven't added any Dockerfiles yet. I guess we can keep them in the separate folder |
@michael-kotliar Great to see more tools! We don't need the top-level |
I like the suffix 1..n to add to tools that may be uploaded by multiple contributors, I think keeping docker repos from biocontainers should be fine for the time being. Tests should be included for each tool group folder. I am working on getting some standard test data we can use to do unit tests on all the PRs. We can find a place to centrally store them. |
#105 (comment) --> Nathan brings up important point of having version folders |
Here we need to decide the structure of the this repository. As it was agreed, every tool should be placed in a separate directory. The questions are:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: