You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Initially the tool had been designed for migration flow only.
Now we change the context to allow for any bulk operations.
I think to "support" this context the main loop would need to support the following scenarios:
Have the summary.status set to 'NA'
API call succeeds
Assign the summary.status to 'OK'
Run a custom function (passed to the loop) that takes in API response object and returns "sub-status". Migration would have the four. But then in context of, let's say, bulk metadata updates the "sub-status" may be different
API call fails
Assign the summary.status to 'ERR'
This will allow to identify records with summary.status set to 'NA' (indicating an anomaly) as well as filter the report for those OK/ERR values. The "sub-status" (name to be determined) field can then be used for further filtering depending on the reporting needs.
Should this not be set after we have the response?
I see there being 4 status':
overwrite
was set totrue
(overwritten
is in the response object)overwrite
was set tofalse
(existing
is in the response object)Originally posted by @mgriff in #7 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: