Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Deprecate this.is() #5

Open
rkaw92 opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Deprecate this.is() #5

rkaw92 opened this issue Sep 15, 2014 · 0 comments
Assignees
@rkaw92
Milestone
Production quality

Comments

@rkaw92
Copy link
Member

rkaw92 commented Sep 15, 2014

Currently, modules may specify their names via "is" and their provided resource names via "provides". This duplication is unnecessary, since only the provided name matters to the composition process and to dependent modules. Thus, is() should be removed from the library.
@rkaw92 rkaw92 self-assigned this Sep 15, 2014
@rkaw92 rkaw92 added this to the Production quality milestone Sep 15, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@rkaw92 rkaw92

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Production quality
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@rkaw92