##ClojureBridge MN March 2014
- Very likely - 16
- Somewhat likely - 1 (number 14)
- People, clear (mostly) instructions, good food
- Friendly, helpful, mentors!
- I like the pace of level 1
- Welcoming to people at all experience levels. Event TAs had different experience levels, which was great! Also, the panel was great!
- The enthusiasm. Getting women together to work toward a common goal.
- How supportive everyone was.
- The amount of support from the TAs. And the food.
- I was very happy with the amount of things covered. The environment was supportive/friendly and not as intimidating as I expected.
- Organization and coordinating the event. Kudos! Also, plenty of food.
- The informal installfest help as well as the kindness and helpfulness of the TAs
- I won a free Clojure Programming Guide.
- Good (clear) instructions. Knowledgeable TAs that worked together to get us the answers.
- TAs were super helpful and kind!
- Everyone was really welcoming, friend and super helpful
- People getting excited about getting something working and the discussion panel.
- The helpful and friendly Tas!
- TAs were super helpful and nice
###3. What should we change?
- Do more of an initial overview for track 1 - what clojure is used for, it's basic syntax etc. Also, installfest didn't seem necessary - took me ~15 mins. But thanks for the pizza!
- Not sure. Maybe tables to sit at instead?
- It might be better to have a quick 30 minute explaining clojure.
- So much food! :)
- Remind people to use IM to communicate. Great idea, but it was forgotten.
- Nothing.
- With in the material, I suggest milestones - that way concepts are distinct and it allows for breaks in the work-flow/day
- The instructions should be impeccable - when there are typos, assume we don't understand it. Also, when people are finished, talking quietly helps those reading not to become distracted.
- Track 2: more explanation of syntax
- I would say that track 2 is for Experienced Programmers versus "experience with programming."
- Clearer and concise instructions for sample coding.
- I know people work at different paces (and learn differently), but I think it would be helpful to have some "lecture" on a topic, time for questions, then time to actually make the changes. Short of that, I would encourage participants to read everything in the instructions and type the code (rather than copy/paste). I know this will cause more mistakes, but that's a great way to learn!
- Curriculum has a few typos and it unclear in some spots.
- I feel like I didn't learn much at all about Clojure itself. I followed the instructions fine, but wished there was more instructions about what we were actually doing.
- A location with tables would make it easier to work together.
- The tutorial materials sometimes jump around, doesn't explain enough. Also, for a totally new person, a lot of big concepts. Likely to be a risk of copying and pasting w/out knowing/understanding what you're doing.
- Written instructions were confusing - seemed to jump (mini) steps
- Thank you! it was great to feel successful so quickly. Too many TAs?
- na
- Practical examples
- A room with actual tables might be nice for collaboration, but everything is donated, so I understand you can't be picky!
- Thank you.
- The food was fantastic. - thanks!
- One other suggestion in the material is to link back to previous task - we learned to create a branch and then later it said create a branch - linking to the original explanation would be helpful
- I liked that we could go at our own pace. I like to take my time reading and rereading. I appreciate the format.
- Gr8 job!!!
- I really appreciate the effort that was made to accommodate different preferences. (Food, learning styles, etc.)
- More information on bootcamps or trade schools providing certifications or degree programs.
- Thank you all so much for organizing this!! It was great. =)
- Thank you!!!! :)
- I liked getting to use git and feel like I have a decent understanding of that!
- na
- Thank you for all the work from the organizers and volunteers!
- :)
Random handwritten paper survey: (This might be from Brian Dawn regarding Track 2)
- Agree on a subset of the syntax in the examples to not confuse people
- Ensure every feature is preselected before it's used. +1
- Simpler threading macro example
- Acculomate with clojure limits
- Limit column width to 70
- Hack time is awesome
- Pods, issue with room
- Maybe we should add to the survey who the primary TA was that was helping them. This would help us get a sense of the TAs that were really creating an impact.
- Good git tutorial
- Something for people who want more depth. Links to more information on the web?
- Track one still needs some polishing. (Typos, milestones, how to balance self lead instruction with lecturing, copy pasting ok?, bigger concepts missed?, jumps around)
- Track two framing. Who is this for?
- Location with tables