Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extension's extraCityObjects schema does not reflect the specs #139

Open
balazsdukai opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Extension's extraCityObjects schema does not reflect the specs #139

balazsdukai opened this issue Nov 10, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@balazsdukai
Copy link
Member

The specs declare 6 rules to follow to define new CityObjects, but according to the schema anything is allowed in a CityObject:

"(\\+)([A-Z])\\w+": {}

Shouldn't the extraCityObjects validation schema be more specific?

@hugoledoux
Copy link
Member

it should, but not sure how/what to validate... it's not so simple I'm afraid.

We could verify if the part is a valid json schema, but I wouldn't know how... Help appreciated here!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants