diff --git a/docs/src/app/concepts/ConceptsTab.jsx b/docs/src/app/concepts/ConceptsTab.jsx index 61dbf7a..d8d742b 100644 --- a/docs/src/app/concepts/ConceptsTab.jsx +++ b/docs/src/app/concepts/ConceptsTab.jsx @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ turing-validating-security-definitions-during-development-process'}
An SDV pipeline does all the same tasks as any existing CI/CD pipeline, however,
if an application code change request results in a change to the security definitions
- required for that application to run an
+ required for that application to run, an
approval process
is initiated, which
must be approved by a Security Admin
diff --git a/docs/src/app/how/approval-bot/ApprovalBotStep.jsx b/docs/src/app/how/approval-bot/ApprovalBotStep.jsx
index a587670..044be67 100644
--- a/docs/src/app/how/approval-bot/ApprovalBotStep.jsx
+++ b/docs/src/app/how/approval-bot/ApprovalBotStep.jsx
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ export default function ApprovalBotStep({
of the SDV workflow.
- At this point, there are two open changes requests, one for the app or test code, and one for the
+ At this point, there are two open change requests, one for the app or test code, and one for the
security baseline, and from the perspective of the SCM tool there is no direct relation between them.
Additionally, SCM tools currently do not provide the ability for actions in a change request to directly
affect the status of another change request in a completely different repository.
diff --git a/docs/src/app/how/ci-pipeline/ciPipelineStep.jsx b/docs/src/app/how/ci-pipeline/ciPipelineStep.jsx
index 60ebc06..a5a3f83 100644
--- a/docs/src/app/how/ci-pipeline/ciPipelineStep.jsx
+++ b/docs/src/app/how/ci-pipeline/ciPipelineStep.jsx
@@ -2371,7 +2371,7 @@ wk '{gsub(/\\./,"-"); print}'\`