Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Brand Identity: Hoop #4

Open
digitalextremist opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Brand Identity: Hoop #4

digitalextremist opened this issue Mar 5, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@digitalextremist
Copy link
Collaborator

Without interrupting the great work here, I propose this brand identity for the resulting polished gem:

I explained more on Slack as to why:

I see Hoop as the basic underlying capacity, like what you did with 0MQ before, both in the noun and verb sense:

  • Noun: circular strip used for holding together
  • Noun: circular figure or object
  • Noun: circle of series of circles used to expand a fabric
  • Noun: the goal of basketball, fuzzy description of an IPC in neanderthal
  • Verb: To bind fast

I would be happy to try and absorb the use of other libraries we have in common and bring them this direction, since this annihilates their purpose, and makes a more coherent value proposition. And then I would implement the polished foundation as a framework in #3:

I know this may seem far-range, as we come to the first solar-year anniversary of the commits to proto-rina and I'm talking about a foundation and framework now, but I think this target and "mythological root system" will help drive a lot of what I see in the journal entries.

To me this work is fundamental to the shift in both Computer Science and Information Technology ahead.

@digitalextremist
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Like I said, I don't see this as replacing the work happening here or taking it over. It's more like the "non-prototype" presentation, which itself will be a prototype at first also, but expect to be production-ready.

I am holding back from being overly excited ( for me ) but I really like the simplicity and what the name communicates, since the overall complexity concealed in the resulting work is confoundingly intense.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant