-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reproduce result from Co-Fusion paper #3
Comments
The I applied a couple of fixes on top of the upstream Co-Fusion to fix compiler warnings and errors. Those fixes can be found in the PR martinruenz/co-fusion#20, which is the same as the The interface to ROS and additional fixes are part of the Can you try the |
Thanks for sharing your experience. When I use the fix_warnings branch, I got the same result as for master branch. I evaluate both car4-full and room4 in the format of klg and extracted RGBD images, using scripts from dataset-tools . I obtained 5cm camera AT RMSE for car4 and 14cm camera AT RMSE for room4. They are much higher than the value indicated in the CF paper. I will open an issue about this problem in the original CF repository. |
Before opening an issue in the Co-Fusion repo, I would suggest that you actually try to reproduce the results with the original implementation on the original |
Hi,
Thanks for sharing the great work!
I was trying to reproduce the result of Co-Fusion and came across your repo since it supports ubuntu 20.04. I managed to build and run MMF. But when I tried to evaluate MMF on car4 and room4 sequence, I couldn't get the same result as in Co-Fusion paper, after disabling the extra command line arguments from MMF. Do you have any experience on how to reproduce CF paper result for car4 and room4 sequences? If so, could you maybe share your the arguments used? Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: