You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I tried to use the provided procrustes_analysis code to align my own optimized camera pose sequence to the ground truth, but found it is not robust to the scale: the aligned pose for [R, t] and [R, 5xt] is different, and thus the resulting R_error and t_error is different (the error for [R, 5xt] is higher than [R, t]). I found that R.det()<0 is True for [R, 5xt], but is False for [R, t]. I wonder if it is caused by numerical precision. Can you help me to make the procrustes_analysis more robust?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your great work!
I tried to use the provided
procrustes_analysis
code to align my own optimized camera pose sequence to the ground truth, but found it is not robust to the scale: the aligned pose for [R, t] and [R, 5xt] is different, and thus the resultingR_error
andt_error
is different (the error for [R, 5xt] is higher than [R, t]). I found thatR.det()<0
is True for [R, 5xt], but is False for [R, t]. I wonder if it is caused by numerical precision. Can you help me to make theprocrustes_analysis
more robust?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: