Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RuntimeError: cuDNN error: CUDNN_STATUS_NOT_INITIALIZED #2

Open
zxt-triumph opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 7 comments
Open

RuntimeError: cuDNN error: CUDNN_STATUS_NOT_INITIALIZED #2

zxt-triumph opened this issue Feb 19, 2021 · 7 comments

Comments

@zxt-triumph
Copy link

RuntimeError: cuDNN error: CUDNN_STATUS_NOT_INITIALIZED
I always encounter this problem when I reproduce the experiment.
How can i solve this problem?
Looking forward to your reply.

@zxt-triumph
Copy link
Author

By the way, what is the format of the dataset catalog?

@zengmmm00
Copy link

I also have this problem. It occurs because loss = criterion(pred, train_annotations) , where pred and train_annotations have different shapes. You can check the values of pred and train_annotations.

@HeartArmy
Copy link

HeartArmy commented Nov 23, 2022

@zengmmm00 @zxt-triumph Did you guys manage to solve the issue? If so, do you remember what you did to solve the issue? I am sure I arranged the dataset correctly and am not having success debugging the line loss = criterion(pred, train_annotations). Not sure if it's a CUDA/Pytorch dependency error? Thank you.

@bai101315
Copy link

Hello, can you tell me the structure of the OCTA dataset? After downloading the dataset, I couldn't match the dataset structure in the code. I don't know how to handle the OCTA500 dataset to make the code run smoothly. Please give me some suggestions, thank you very much.

@HeartArmy
Copy link

I never did get to run IPN-V2 correctly, so maybe my dataset folder structure was incorrect. Or maybe the problem is with the code itself. I never did figure it out and stopped working with this model.

@bai101315
Copy link

Thank you for your reply. I have seen other people's methods for processing the OCTA500 dataset. I'm also giving up on this model. Good luck for you!

@HeartArmy
Copy link

HeartArmy commented Sep 17, 2024

Wishing you the best too. I would suggest trying to pick recent model that has a more active community/authors or where the github issues is active.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants