You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider performance optimization for large lists.
The overall implementation of the ListCard component is well-structured and follows good practices. However, for potentially large lists, you might want to consider implementing virtualization to improve performance.
You could use a library like react-window or react-virtualized to efficiently render large lists. This would involve changing the table structure to a virtualized list, but it could significantly improve performance for lists with many items.
Here's a basic example of how you might start implementing this with react-window:
import{FixedSizeListasList}from'react-window';// ... (inside your component)constRow=({ index, style })=>{constitem=currentItems[index];return(<divstyle={style}>{/* Render your item here, similar to your current table row */}</div>);};return(<Listheight={400}// Adjust based on your needsitemCount={currentItems.length}itemSize={35}// Adjust based on your row heightwidth="100%">{Row}</List>);
This is just a starting point and would need to be adapted to your specific use case and styling requirements.
Consider performance optimization for large lists.
The overall implementation of the
ListCard
component is well-structured and follows good practices. However, for potentially large lists, you might want to consider implementing virtualization to improve performance.You could use a library like
react-window
orreact-virtualized
to efficiently render large lists. This would involve changing the table structure to a virtualized list, but it could significantly improve performance for lists with many items.Here's a basic example of how you might start implementing this with
react-window
:This is just a starting point and would need to be adapted to your specific use case and styling requirements.
Originally posted by @coderabbitai[bot] in #46 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: