Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Releasing results.txt in order to simulate different metas #94

Open
tesslovescode opened this issue Jun 19, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Releasing results.txt in order to simulate different metas #94

tesslovescode opened this issue Jun 19, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@tesslovescode
Copy link

I think it would be interesting if we could look at results.txt and run it through the tool I wrote to simulate different metas. Ppl might be interested to see how they did if the meta had been different.

@duckboycool
Copy link

duckboycool commented Jun 19, 2021

The results.txt isn't very convenient to parse, but 5 rounds worth of the raw results matrix can be found here. This still includes cheating strategies.

Also, you're going to want to use the finalRoster.txt file if you want to know which strat each index is (they're in order of index) since strats removed before the rounds started are not included.

@tesslovescode
Copy link
Author

So, just to make sure I understand you correctly, the line at which s# appears in finalRoster.txt is the actual s# that's listed in the raw results matrix?

@tesslovescode
Copy link
Author

The results.txt isn't very convenient to parse, but 5 rounds worth of the raw results matrix can be found here. This still includes cheating strategies.

Agreed. But I've already gone through the inconvenience of parsing results.txt assuming it would be the final output format

@duckboycool
Copy link

So, just to make sure I understand you correctly, the line at which s# appears in finalRoster.txt is the actual s# that's listed in the raw results matrix?

Yes, you can use .split('\n') to generate a list, then .index to get the index of a strategy from its name.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants