Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update examples to follow more inclusive language #32

Closed
aaronshurley opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Update examples to follow more inclusive language #32

aaronshurley opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Labels
carvel-accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed carvel-triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity enhancement This issue is a feature request

Comments

@aaronshurley
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the problem/challenge you have
Update the example (test/e2e/assets/guestbook-all-in-one.yml) to follow more inclusive language.

Describe the solution you'd like
So that the inclusive naming checker job passes without ignoring the following example: test/e2e/assets/guestbook-all-in-one.yml

Anything else you would like to add:
Originated from https://github.com/vmware-tanzu/carvel/issues/594

@aaronshurley aaronshurley added enhancement This issue is a feature request carvel-triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity carvel-accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed and removed carvel-triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity labels Nov 28, 2022
@joaopapereira
Copy link
Member

Merged

@github-actions github-actions bot added the carvel-triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity label Sep 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
carvel-accepted This issue should be considered for future work and that the triage process has been completed carvel-triage This issue has not yet been reviewed for validity enhancement This issue is a feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants