We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Put this into my recipe by mistake:
inputs: source-ms: aliases: [prep.source-ms] default: msdir/1729634772_sdp_l0-Jupiter-corr.ms dir-out-base: aliases: [prep.dir-out-base] default: msdir
Mistake, because prep.dir-out-base is an output. But instead of an error, I get
prep.dir-out-base
(stimela) oms@janis:~/projects/JoveS$ stimela doc jove-prepare.yml jove-prepare 2024-11-26 15:35:03 STIMELA INFO: starting 2024-11-26 15:35:03 STIMELA INFO: loaded full configuration from cache 2024-11-26 15:35:03 STIMELA INFO: saving config dependencies to ./stimela.config.deps 2024-11-26 15:35:03 STIMELA INFO: will load recipe/config file jove-prepare.yml 2024-11-26 15:35:04 STIMELA INFO: loaded 6 cab definition(s) and 3 recipe(s) stimela doc jove-prepare.yml jove-prepare └── Recipe: jove-prepare ├── Description: │ └── Gets timeranges and runs jove-prepare-loop ├── Required inputs: │ └── source-ms MS [default: msdir/1729634772_sdp_l0-Jupiter-corr.ms] ├── Optional inputs: │ └── dir-out-base str [default: msdir] ├── Required outputs: │ └── dir-out-base Directory ├── Obscure outputs: omitting 1 └── Steps: └── get-ranges prep (stimela) oms@janis:~/projects/JoveS$
While I'm fixing this -- note that aliases to multiple named file outputs should be allowed. The latter should be fixed along with #287.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Put this into my recipe by mistake:
Mistake, because
prep.dir-out-base
is an output. But instead of an error, I getWhile I'm fixing this -- note that aliases to multiple named file outputs should be allowed. The latter should be fixed along with #287.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: