You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 8, 2024. It is now read-only.
Could you explain a reason to implement MaxMemory using a simple json/encoding to count the byte size? Because simple json/encoding using at least TWICE memory than actual objects!!! MaxMemory should keep memory usage in boundaries but instead it guarantee than memory boundaries would be breached. MaxMemory not just useless - it is dangerous in current implementation because actual memory usage 3 times more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
ddv2005
changed the title
MaxMemory useless because using a simple json/encoding to count the byte size
MaxMemory dangerous
Jul 18, 2022
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Could you explain a reason to implement MaxMemory using a simple json/encoding to count the byte size? Because simple json/encoding using at least TWICE memory than actual objects!!! MaxMemory should keep memory usage in boundaries but instead it guarantee than memory boundaries would be breached. MaxMemory not just useless - it is dangerous in current implementation because actual memory usage 3 times more.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: