Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Avoid unnecesary task creation for slicing arrays #325

Open
salvisolamartinell opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

Avoid unnecesary task creation for slicing arrays #325

salvisolamartinell opened this issue Dec 10, 2020 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request python related Issues that can be solved just with Python knowledge

Comments

@salvisolamartinell
Copy link
Collaborator

salvisolamartinell commented Dec 10, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Describe the bug
Slicing a ds-array creates unnecessary tasks when the slice matches with the blocks.

To Reproduce
No details available.

Expected behavior
Ds-array slicing shouldn't create unnecessary tasks.

Environment (please complete the following information):

  • COMPSs version: 2.8
  • Dislib version: 0.6.4

Additional context
This has been reported in a program using utils.shuffle(x,y) + _paired_partition(x,y). _paired_partition creates unnecessary tasks.

Related: avoid sending the inner blocks to a task when slicing an array.
@salvisolamartinell salvisolamartinell added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request python related Issues that can be solved just with Python knowledge and removed bug Something isn't working labels Dec 10, 2020
@cTatu cTatu added this to the release 0.8 milestone Oct 10, 2022
@cTatu cTatu removed this from the release 0.8 milestone Nov 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
enhancement New feature or request python related Issues that can be solved just with Python knowledge
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@salvisolamartinell @cTatu