We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The loss of the type decorator =foo after this query was unexpected.
=foo
$ echo '{MyStr:"hello",MyNum:1}(=foo)' | super -c 'MyNum:=2' - {MyStr:"hello",MyNum:2}
Repro is with super commit 6e7d041.
Let's say I start with a JSUP value that has a decorator for a named record type:
$ super -version Version: v1.18.0-189-g6e7d041f $ echo '{MyStr:"hello",MyNum:1}(=foo)' | super - {MyStr:"hello",MyNum:1}(=foo)
I run a query that changes a primitive value in the record without disturbing the type of that primitive value.
The type decorator was no longer present on the output, but I expected it would be there.
In seeking a preliminary reaction on what I observed here, @nwt agreed that the named type should probably be preserved, hence the issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
tl;dr
The loss of the type decorator
=foo
after this query was unexpected.Details
Repro is with super commit 6e7d041.
Let's say I start with a JSUP value that has a decorator for a named record type:
I run a query that changes a primitive value in the record without disturbing the type of that primitive value.
The type decorator was no longer present on the output, but I expected it would be there.
In seeking a preliminary reaction on what I observed here, @nwt agreed that the named type should probably be preserved, hence the issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: