You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we should consider retaining the package structure in generated stubs. because we flatten everything into a single module stub at the moment, we introduce a lot of unnecessary naming constraints that otherwise aren't required by the compiler (two types can't have the same name even across different packages, if they are in the same module).
proposal:
include namespace in the ref, e.g. foo.Type foo.subpackage.Type
and generate stubs with directory structure correspondingly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
we should consider retaining the package structure in generated stubs. because we flatten everything into a single module stub at the moment, we introduce a lot of unnecessary naming constraints that otherwise aren't required by the compiler (two types can't have the same name even across different packages, if they are in the same module).
proposal:
include namespace in the ref, e.g.
foo.Type
foo.subpackage.Type
and generate stubs with directory structure correspondingly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: