You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd like to start a discussion on the target of the gbs_moa repository. In its current state I believe it is accurately extending the workshop that @relshire presented in Feb 2014 in doing the same as the bash scripts did, but with the addition of Moa as a controlling meta layer.
I'd like this revision to be tagged as such, if agreement is made that it accurately represents the commands run during that workshop in a moa-fied way.
I'd like this to happen so we can decide on and work on where we are going next.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, replicating that was the target as the target if the current work was to give a draft to help comparing make and moa, thus the effort is only linmited at this stage. However, the discussion is of course welcome. I would nevertheless finishing this off and come to a conclusio with the group as to whther we moafy things or not.
I'd like to start a discussion on the target of the gbs_moa repository. In its current state I believe it is accurately extending the workshop that @relshire presented in Feb 2014 in doing the same as the bash scripts did, but with the addition of Moa as a controlling meta layer.
I'd like this revision to be tagged as such, if agreement is made that it accurately represents the commands run during that workshop in a moa-fied way.
I'd like this to happen so we can decide on and work on where we are going next.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: