You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Running npm install && ./node_modules/.bin/license-to-fail gives the following output:
INDIRECT DEP - @progress/[email protected] SEE LICENSE in LICENSE.md: https://github.com/telerik/kendo-schematics
INDIRECT DEP - [email protected] UNKNOWN: https://github.com/Marak/colors.js
This is fine as [email protected] does not have any license information attached and kendo-schematics refers to a custom license file in its package.json.
But after adding an exclusion for package colors the warning for kendo-schematics also vanishes:
..."allowedPackages": [
{
"name": "colors",
"reason": "checked manually: license is MIT, see https://github.com/Marak/colors.js/blob/master/LICENSE"
}
],
...
Furthermore, if name is set to foo only colors is reported. So any entry in allowedPackages makes the warnings for the kendo-schematics license disappear.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Any entry in
allowedPackages
makes the warning for the custom license in package@progress/[email protected]
disappear.Reproduction:
Create the following
package.json
:Running
npm install && ./node_modules/.bin/license-to-fail
gives the following output:This is fine as
[email protected]
does not have any license information attached andkendo-schematics
refers to a custom license file in itspackage.json
.But after adding an exclusion for package
colors
the warning forkendo-schematics
also vanishes:Furthermore, if
name
is set tofoo
onlycolors
is reported. So any entry inallowedPackages
makes the warnings for thekendo-schematics
license disappear.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: