Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Question on "complexity" column in index.md #41

Open
henry-ngo opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Question on "complexity" column in index.md #41

henry-ngo opened this issue May 23, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@henry-ngo
Copy link
Collaborator

As we discussed on Teams, I'm working on a PR from my fork of this repo to add some of the new information learned from the April 2024 mapping demo day. Since the last major update to index.md, we have a lot more examples of tools across government which I think would be helpful to add to the Look and feel section of this page.

One of the things I'd like to do is simplify the table (see screenshot below) to:

  • add a column that makes it more clear to the reader which of the four frameworks listed in the above section applies to each tool (e.g. SaaS, Gov-hosted, DIY, or Custom)
  • Combine Client and Example column into one, where we have a list of the client or tool name that is hyperlinked instead of writing out the URL. This would make it easier to list multiple tools for the same framework

One question is the Complexity column. Does "complexity" apply to the framework or specific tool (looks like the latter but want to be sure). Also, how is it determined? Is it still necessary to have? The table might be neater if we dropped this column. Would love to hear thoughts.

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant