You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi ,
We are using nat46 80dda1d revision and facing few issue forwarding fragmented packets.
8 byte IPv6 fragmentation header issue.
When we tried to adjust pmtu lesser by 8 byte, we are seeing improvement.
*pmtu = htons(ntohs(*pmtu) - 28);
We are yet to confirm if this solves the problem or not, as we faced Issue 2 as below.
Translated packets on map0 doesn't have psid in IPv6 header for 2nd fragment.
Because of this issue, we are not getting response from BR for big packets.
Is this a known issue in nat46 or any fix available ?
Thanks in advance.
Harnish
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Harnish, I am not doing huge deverlopment/testing on this code myself at the moment, mostly managing the PRs from a few contributors/testers... So, a few questions:
is the behavior without 80dda1d better bug-wise ? I am happy to back it out. I was not very enthusiastic about any fragment support in the first place, but I was talked into it :) If there is a new bug then my hunch might be true.
I do not see any open PRs about it, so I assume there isn't... So, you are welcome to contribute your fix(es) :-)
Hi ,
We are using nat46 80dda1d revision and facing few issue forwarding fragmented packets.
8 byte IPv6 fragmentation header issue.
When we tried to adjust pmtu lesser by 8 byte, we are seeing improvement.
*pmtu = htons(ntohs(*pmtu) - 28);
We are yet to confirm if this solves the problem or not, as we faced Issue 2 as below.
Translated packets on map0 doesn't have psid in IPv6 header for 2nd fragment.
Because of this issue, we are not getting response from BR for big packets.
Is this a known issue in nat46 or any fix available ?
Thanks in advance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: