Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: pointcloud_preprocessor load from param #98

Conversation

vividf
Copy link
Contributor

@vividf vividf commented Aug 1, 2024

Description

This PR allows pointcloud_preprocessor.launch.py to load the parameter from yaml file.
This PR should be merged together with autowarefoundation/autoware.universe#8300

Related links

Tests performed

Test with xx1 bag.

ros2 launch autoware_launch logging_simulator.launch.xml map_path:=$HOME/autoware_map/sample-map-rosbag vehicle_model:=sample_vehicle sensor_model:=sample_sensor_kit

Notes for reviewers

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

  • The PR follows the pull request guidelines.
  • The PR has been properly tested.
  • The PR has been reviewed by the code owners.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

  • There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.
  • The PR is ready for merge.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

@vividf vividf requested review from YoshiRi, kminoda and knzo25 August 1, 2024 05:40


def launch_setup(context, *args, **kwargs):
# Pointcloud preprocessor parameters
concatenate_and_time_sync_node_param = ParameterFile(
param_file=LaunchConfiguration("concatenate_and_time_sync_node_param_path").perform(
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vividf vividf self-assigned this Aug 15, 2024
@vividf
Copy link
Contributor Author

vividf commented Nov 8, 2024

This PR #108 does the same thing but has the latest update, thus I will close this one.

I will also test the suggestion from kenzo in another PR

@vividf vividf closed this Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants