Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MDS for Configurator footprint only with randomly sampled configurations #148

Open
mlindauer opened this issue May 2, 2018 · 4 comments

Comments

@mlindauer
Copy link
Contributor

Please train the MDS mapping only on randomly sampled configurations (not on the ones optimized wrt EI). Of course, please still plot all configurations.

(As a reminder of what we discussed last week).

@shukon
Copy link
Collaborator

shukon commented May 2, 2018

sklearns MDS does not provide a transform-method, though there is an open PR: scikit-learn/scikit-learn#9834
I could try to work on the open PR in sklearn to fix this, but I will first look for another implementation/ an alternative algorithm, since I never commited to sklearn before.

@shukon
Copy link
Collaborator

shukon commented May 22, 2018

So looking further into this yielded a more fundamental problem. The MDS-algorithm reduces dimensionality by shifting points around iteratively until the distances show more or less the same distance-matrix as in the higher-dimensional space. Inserting points afterwards is not easily feasible since we have to shift points again. We could, maybe, use a Kernel-function to approximate the mapping (following this idea).

@mlindauer
Copy link
Contributor Author

We could, maybe, use a Kernel-function to approximate the mapping (following this idea).

Sounds interesting. Is an implementation available?
If not, how much time do you expect you will need to implement it?

@jsoutherland
Copy link

@shukon that paper mentioned was the basis for scikit-learn/scikit-learn#9834
by @webdrone which switches the method of computing MDS (no longer using smacof). You may find the code in that PR to be useful.

@shukon shukon removed their assignment Jun 29, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants