Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Want Brewfile? #39

Open
reijop opened this issue Jun 27, 2018 · 5 comments
Open

Want Brewfile? #39

reijop opened this issue Jun 27, 2018 · 5 comments

Comments

@reijop
Copy link

reijop commented Jun 27, 2018

... I may have switched to using a Brewfile. Interested in a PR?

@atomantic
Copy link
Owner

perhaps--can you specify brew cask installs in a brewfile too? I kinda like having all software defined in the config.js file though... keeps it all in one place.

@reijop
Copy link
Author

reijop commented Jul 4, 2018

You can! Build options as well. And to my testing, applied in order. Here's a sample:

tap "chleggett/gqrx"
cask "gqrx"
brew "gnu-sed", args: ["--with-default-names"]
brew "macvim", args: ["with-override-system-vim"]

I like your idea of having everything in one place too, but I never use javascript and the only time NPM and the like are on my system are for installing stuff like this, sooo... This made more sense for me -- 100's of brew entries, virtually no js packages. :)

@atomantic
Copy link
Owner

nice--yeah, and actually, I have to do some brew installs before getting to the config anyway... may as well throw them all into a brewfile :)

@rjrobinson
Copy link

Any traction on this?

@zomars
Copy link

zomars commented Dec 21, 2021

Made a PR #84 , I've found a Brewfile easier to maintain. I'm currently using this without any problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants